Shroud of Turin, part 7
CONCLUSION
So,
we hereby declare: every single result published by STURP scientists has been
deliberately or incompetently misinterpreted and sometimes contrived. It is
outrageous that some of this data were actually published in refereed
scientific journals. Further, we say, STURP members, as referees, must have
reviewed and approved each other's work. The editors must have been personal
friends of certain key participants to allow such callow atrocities to be
perpetrated using the weapons of the institutionalized professional press.
The
story of the Shroud attains excess mythic majesty if left undisturbed to grow
and spread. STURP only added to it. But as a nonsense myth, it will never be
taken to heart by any significant portion of the human race because of its many
smothering flaws.
Much
has been made of the fact that the picture on the cloth represents accurately
every biblical account of the crucifixion and resurrection that can possibly
apply. This has been pointed to as conclusive proof of authenticity - as if the
Bible must not have been available to any artists of the 14th century,
especially not to illiterate French artists.
These
Shroud fans' claims are an insult against France and against the French people.
They belittle the bishops and the whole Church of France whose investigations
of old have shown that the cloth is a fake. In the light of the testimony of
witnesses from the time of its first appearance that it is phony, extraordinary
proof of great quality and quantity is needed to reverse this condemnation.
This proof is what STURP tried desperately to supply. But at best STURP'S
evidence is inconclusive and if other facts are considered, such as Dr.
McCrone's discoveries, the mass of evidence weighs more heavily against the
Shroud. This even without the radiocarbon dating that corroborates McCrone.
Besides
this and even besides the theological arguments against the Shroud, legion as
they are, there is a certain wonder that the Shroud has got as far as it did
for so long. In fact, that the Shroud has survived so long is often referred to
as if its longevity (since the 14th century, at least) was further proof of its
divine origin.
If
the Shroud image is not divine, how has it been able to survive so long and why
do so many people believe in it? The answer cannot be stated simply. Apart from
this episode of High Pseudo science, the Shroud phenomenon can be adequately
rationalized by analysis that explicitly takes into account the history,
rivalry and politics between France and Italy. The true answer to the mystery
of the Shroud of Turin resides most patently in the reasons for Geoffrey de
Charney of France's loss and Savoy of Italy's gain. Besides being the greatest
art fraud in history and one of the greatest scientific frauds, the Shroud of
Turin ranks as one of the world's most battered political footballs.
It
is more than a mere coincidence that the Shroud legally belongs to the exiled
King of Italy and his family and that his House of Savoy stands to gain by the
continuing political turmoil in that country. Royals love to meddle even if
they don't have anything material to gain. This particular Shroud
controversy was deliberately encouraged by King Humberto and his relatives as a
means of keeping the royal family in the eye of the Italian public.
Careful
analysis suggests that Humberto had used some unscrupulous or gullible
scientists in Europe and America to maintain himself in a position to influence
the course of events inside Italy. He dreamt of engineering a return to the
Italian monarchy. In a country that is almost 100% Roman Catholic, the man who
can successfully claim to own such a holy relic as a fully authenticated and
universally recognized Shroud could parlay his "monopoly of Jesus"
into, who knows? Machiavelli would be proud.
Just
remember that there are a number of angles from which to view the cloth. When
examining this case, though it is nothing more than an artist's picture, there
is indeed much more to the famous Shroud of Turin than hits the eye. The late
singer Dean Martin would agree that it is all ultimately a matter of faith and amore
no matter how much the Shroud is likened to a bright, full, romantic
rectangular moon or a big, oblong pizza pie.
additional Keywords
artist,
Buddhism, carbon‑14, Catholic, Christianity, counterfeit, crucifixion, fake,
forgery, fresco, fronde, God, Hindu, hoax, image, ink, iron earth, cinnabar,
iron oxide, Islam, Jesus, JPL, linen, logic, logical, Los Alamos, micro‑optical,
microchemical, microscopy, phony, pigment, polarized light microscope,
pseudoscience, pseudoscientist, radiocarbon dating, resurrection, science,
scientific, scientific method, scientist, shroud, Shroud of Turin, Shroud of
Turin Research Project, STURP, supernatural, tempera, Turin, Walter C. McCrone,
work of art
No comments:
Post a Comment